Path dependent analysis of logic programs
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Goal Dependent vs. Goal Independent Analysis of Logic Programs
Abs t r ac t . Goal independent analysis of logic programs is commonly discussed in the context of the bottom-up approach. However, while the literature is rich in descriptions of top-down analysers and their application, practical experience with bottom-up analysis is still in a preliminary stage. Moreover, the practical use of existing top-down frameworks for goal independent analysis has not...
متن کاملIncremental Analysis of Logic Programs
Global analyzers traditionally read and analyze the entire program at once, in a non-incremental way. However, there are many situations which are not well suited to this simple model and which instead require reanalysis of certain parts of a program which has already been analyzed. In these cases, it appears ineecient to perform the analysis of the program again from scratch, as needs to be do...
متن کاملAnalysis of Imperative Programs through Analysis of Constraint Logic Programs
In this paper a method is proposed for carrying out analysis of imperative programs. We achieve this by writing down the language semantics as a declarative program (a constraint logic program, in the approach shown here). We propose an e ective style of writing operational semantics suitable for analysis which we call one-state small-step semantics. Through controlled partial evaluation we are...
متن کاملAnalysis of Normal Logic Programs
In this paper we present a dataaow analysis method for normal logic programs interpreted with negation as failure or constructive negation. We apply our method to a well known analysis for logic programs: the depth(k) analysis for approximating the set of computed answers. The analysis is correct w.r.t. SLDNF resolution and optimal w.r.t. constructive negation.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ACM SIGPLAN Notices
سال: 2002
ISSN: 0362-1340,1558-1160
DOI: 10.1145/509799.503038